Celeris-1 vs Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Medium Effort)
Which is better for the money: Celeris-1 by Celeris or Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Medium Effort) by Anthropic? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-09.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Medi… scores 38.8 points higher (45.1 vs 6.3) but costs 46× as much to run the benchmark ($2732 vs $60.0; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Medi… when you need intelligence above 6.3, and Celeris-1 when 6.3 is enough.
| Metric | Celeris-1 | Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Medium Effort) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 6.3 | 45.1 | +615.9% Claude Opus 5 (Adapti… is 7.2× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $59.99 | $2,731.91 | +4453.9% Claude Opus 5 (Adapti… is 46× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 0.97s | 13.90s | +1333.0% Claude Opus 5 (Adapti… is 1333.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $0.70 | $5.00 / $25.0 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Medium Effort) vs Celeris-1: 615.9% more intelligence, 4453.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 1333.0% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Celeris-1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.5 scores 22.30 for $42.6.
- Claude Opus 5 (medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Astra (medium) scores 49.70 for $2434.
Celeris-1Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Medium Effort)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/claude-opus-5-medium · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/claude-opus-5-medium?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill