Celeris-1 vs Gemini 3.7 Flash (medium)
Which is better for the money: Celeris-1 by Celeris or Gemini 3.7 Flash (medium) by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-08-17.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 3.7 Flash (medium) scores 41.0 points higher (53.4 vs 12.4) but costs 1.8× as much to run the benchmark ($278 vs $157; both mid-range class). Pick Gemini 3.7 Flash (medium) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Celeris-1.
| Metric | Celeris-1 | Gemini 3.7 Flash (medium) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 12.4 | 53.4 | +330.6% Gemini 3.7 Flash (med… is 4.3× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $156.79 | $277.50 | +77.0% Gemini 3.7 Flash (med… is 77.0% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 0.97s | Not reported | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $0.70 | $0.75 / $3.75 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Gemini 3.7 Flash (medium) vs Celeris-1: 330.6% more intelligence, 77.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Celeris-1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (xhigh) scores 50.10 for $95.1.
- Gemini 3.7 Flash (medium) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Celeris-1Gemini 3.7 Flash (medium)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/gemini-3-7-flash-medium · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/gemini-3-7-flash-medium?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill