Celeris-1 vs Gemini 3.7 Flash (high)
Which is better for the money: Celeris-1 by Celeris or Gemini 3.7 Flash (high) by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-09.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 3.7 Flash (high) scores 33.1 points higher (39.4 vs 6.3) but costs 18× as much to run the benchmark ($1084 vs $60.0; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 3.7 Flash (high) when you need intelligence above 6.3, and Celeris-1 when 6.3 is enough.
| Metric | Celeris-1 | Gemini 3.7 Flash (high) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 6.3 | 39.4 | +525.4% Gemini 3.7 Flash (hig… is 6.3× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $59.99 | $1,084.46 | +1707.7% Gemini 3.7 Flash (hig… is 18× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 0.97s | 11.48s | +1083.5% Gemini 3.7 Flash (hig… is 1083.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $0.70 | $0.75 / $3.75 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Gemini 3.7 Flash (high) vs Celeris-1: 525.4% more intelligence, 1707.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 1083.5% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Celeris-1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.5 scores 22.30 for $42.6.
- Gemini 3.7 Flash (high) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 41.90 for $280.
Celeris-1Gemini 3.7 Flash (high)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/gemini-3-7-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/gemini-3-7-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill