Celeris-1 vs Gemma 3n E4B Instruct

Celeris-1 vs Gemma 3n E4B Instruct. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricCeleris-1Gemma 3n E4B InstructDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)12.41.0−91.9% Gemma 3n E4B Instruct is 91.9% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$156.79Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)0.95s10.53s+1008.4% Gemma 3n E4B Instruct is 1008.4% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.20 / $0.70$0.06 / $0.12
Input modalitiesNot reportedNot reported
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/gemma-3n-e4b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/gemma-3n-e4b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill