Celeris-1 vs HyperNova 60B 2605
Which is better for the money: Celeris-1 by Celeris or HyperNova 60B 2605 by Multiverse Computing? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-01.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick HyperNova 60B 2605
HyperNova 60B 2605 vs Celeris-1: 47.6% more intelligence, 76.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 768.8% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Celeris-1 | HyperNova 60B 2605 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 12.4 | 18.3 | +47.6% HyperNova 60B 2605 is 47.6% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $156.79 | $37.50 | −76.1% HyperNova 60B 2605 is 76.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 0.93s | 8.08s | +768.8% HyperNova 60B 2605 is 768.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.20 / $0.70 | $0.04 / $0.14 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Celeris-1 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 57.50 for $138.
- HyperNova 60B 2605 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (medium) scores 38.90 for $21.5.
Celeris-1HyperNova 60B 2605Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/hypernova-60b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/celeris-1/hypernova-60b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill