Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) vs Kimi K2.7 Code
Which is better for the money: Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) by Anthropic or Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-09.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K2.7 Code scores 8.7 points higher (26.3 vs 17.6) but costs 1.9× as much to run the benchmark ($993 vs $524; both premium class). Pick Kimi K2.7 Code when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning).
| Metric | Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) | Kimi K2.7 Code | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 17.6 | 26.3 | +49.4% Kimi K2.7 Code is 49.4% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $524.25 | $992.88 | +89.4% Kimi K2.7 Code is 89.4% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 28.93s | 41.22s | +42.5% Kimi K2.7 Code is 42.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.00 / $5.00 | $0.95 / $4.00 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Kimi K2.7 Code vs Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning): 49.4% more intelligence, 89.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 42.5% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 41.90 for $280.
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 41.90 for $280.
Claude 4.5 Haiku (Reasoning)Kimi K2.7 CodeToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-5-haiku-reasoning/kimi-k2-7-code · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-4-5-haiku-reasoning/kimi-k2-7-code?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill