Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) vs Command A

Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) vs Command A. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
38.80
Total cost
-
CohereCommand ANot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
7.50
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High Effort)Command ADifference
Intelligence (higher is better)38.87.5−80.7% Command A is 80.7% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)16.40s10.51s−35.9% Command A is 35.9% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$5.00 / $25.0$2.50 / $10.0
Input modalitiesNot reportedNot reported
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Opus 4.6 (non-reasoning, high): what beats itCommand A: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-6/command-a · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-6/command-a?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill