Claude Opus 4.7 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) vs Phi-4

Claude Opus 4.7 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) vs Phi-4. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Opus 4.7 (Non-reasoning, High Effort)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
30.90
Total cost
-
MicrosoftPhi-4Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
5.90
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Opus 4.7 (Non-reasoning, High Effort)Phi-4Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)30.95.9−80.9% Phi-4 is 80.9% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)11.96s14.64s+22.4% Phi-4 is 22.4% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$5.00 / $25.0$0.13 / $0.50
Input modalitiesNot reportedNot reported
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Opus 4.7 (non-reasoning, high): what beats itPhi-4: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-7-non-reasoning/phi-4 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-7-non-reasoning/phi-4?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill