Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) vs Kimi K2.7 Code
Which is better for the money: Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) by Anthropic or Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-08-07.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive Reasoning, Ma… scores 12.0 points higher (55.0 vs 43.0) but costs 6.9× as much to run the benchmark ($3743 vs $545; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive Reasoning, Ma… when you need intelligence above 43.0, and Kimi K2.7 Code when 43.0 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) | Kimi K2.7 Code | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 55.0 | 43.0 | −21.8% Kimi K2.7 Code is 21.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,742.65 | $544.58 | −85.4% Kimi K2.7 Code is 85.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 26.46s | 66.82s | +152.5% Kimi K2.7 Code is 152.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $25.0 | $0.95 / $4.00 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Kimi K2.7 Code vs Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort): 21.8% less intelligence, 85.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 152.5% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Opus 4.7 (max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Xhigh Effort) scores 62.50 for $2909.
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (max) scores 52.30 for $172.
Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)Kimi K2.7 CodeToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-7/kimi-k2-7-code · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-7/kimi-k2-7-code?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill