Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, High Effort) vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, High Effort) by Anthropic or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-09.
Depends on your budget
Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, High… scores 38.1 points higher (48.2 vs 10.1) but costs 9.1× as much to run the benchmark ($4332 vs $476; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, High… when you need intelligence above 10.1, and Qwen3 Coder Next when 10.1 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, High Effort) | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 48.2 | 10.1 | −79.0% Qwen3 Coder Next is 79.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $4,331.68 | $476.03 | −89.0% Qwen3 Coder Next is 89.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 29.21s | 5.52s | −81.1% Qwen3 Coder Next is 81.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $25.0 | $0.35 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, High Effort): 79.0% less intelligence, 89.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 81.1% faster end-to-end.
Against the frontier
- Claude Opus 5 (high) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Astra (xhigh) scores 52.50 for $3803.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 41.90 for $280.
Compare something else
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-high/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-high/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill