Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Medium Effort) vs Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)
Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Medium Effort) vs Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Medium Effort) | Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 45.1 | 8.9 | −80.3% Gemma 4 E4B (Reasonin… is 80.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,731.91 | Not reported | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 13.90s | 61.26s | +340.7% Gemma 4 E4B (Reasonin… is 340.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $25.0 | $0.02 / $0.10 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-medium/gemma-4-e4b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5-medium/gemma-4-e4b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill