Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) vs HyperNova 60B 2605
Which is better for the money: Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) by Anthropic or HyperNova 60B 2605 by Multiverse Computing? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-08-07.
Depends on your budget
Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max … scores 44.8 points higher (63.1 vs 18.3) but costs 102× as much to run the benchmark ($3836 vs $37.5; flagship vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max … when you need intelligence above 18.3, and HyperNova 60B 2605 when 18.3 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) | HyperNova 60B 2605 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 63.1 | 18.3 | −71.0% HyperNova 60B 2605 is 71.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,836.05 | $37.50 | −99.0% HyperNova 60B 2605 is 99.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 65.95s | 6.93s | −89.5% HyperNova 60B 2605 is 89.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $25.0 | $0.04 / $0.14 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
HyperNova 60B 2605 vs Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort): 71.0% less intelligence, 99.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 89.5% faster end-to-end.
Against the frontier
- Claude Opus 5 (max) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- HyperNova 60B 2605 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (medium) scores 38.90 for $21.1.
Compare something else
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5/hypernova-60b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5/hypernova-60b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill