Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) by Anthropic or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-09.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max … scores 40.6 points higher (50.7 vs 10.1) but costs 15× as much to run the benchmark ($7275 vs $476; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max … when you need intelligence above 10.1, and Qwen3 Coder Next when 10.1 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort) | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 50.7 | 10.1 | −80.1% Qwen3 Coder Next is 80.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $7,274.74 | $476.03 | −93.5% Qwen3 Coder Next is 93.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 79.18s | 5.52s | −93.0% Qwen3 Coder Next is 93.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $25.0 | $0.35 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort): 80.1% less intelligence, 93.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 93.0% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Opus 5 (max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Astra (max) scores 52.80 for $5324.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 41.90 for $280.
Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort)Qwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-5/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill