Claude Sonnet 5 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) vs Kimi K2.7 Code
Which is better for the money: Claude Sonnet 5 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) by Anthropic or Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-08-07.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K2.7 Code scores 0.4 points higher (43.0 vs 42.6) but costs 1.3× as much to run the benchmark ($545 vs $416; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick Kimi K2.7 Code when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Claude Sonnet 5 (Non-reasoning, High Ef….
| Metric | Claude Sonnet 5 (Non-reasoning, High Effort) | Kimi K2.7 Code | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 42.6 | 43.0 | +0.9% Kimi K2.7 Code is 0.9% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $415.75 | $544.58 | +31.0% Kimi K2.7 Code is 31.0% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 10.06s | 66.82s | +564.2% Kimi K2.7 Code is 564.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.95 / $4.00 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Kimi K2.7 Code vs Claude Sonnet 5 (Non-reasoning, High Effort): 0.9% more intelligence, 31.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 564.2% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Sonnet 5 (non-reasoning, high) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (max) scores 52.30 for $172.
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (max) scores 52.30 for $172.
Claude Sonnet 5 (Non-reasoning, High Effort)Kimi K2.7 CodeToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-non-reasoning/kimi-k2-7-code · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-non-reasoning/kimi-k2-7-code?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill