Command A vs GLM-5.2 (max)

Command A vs GLM-5.2 (max). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

CohereCommand ANot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
7.00
Total cost
-
Z AIGLM-5.2 (max)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
38.60
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricCommand AGLM-5.2 (max)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)7.038.6+451.4% GLM-5.2 (max) is 5.5× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)9.08s41.95s+362.0% GLM-5.2 (max) is 362.0% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$2.50 / $10.0$1.40 / $4.40
Input modalitiesNot reportedNot reported
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerCommand A: what beats itGLM-5.2 (max): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/command-a/glm-5-2 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/command-a/glm-5-2?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill