Command A vs GPT-5 nano (medium)

Command A vs GPT-5 nano (medium). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

CohereCommand ANot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
7.00
Total cost
-
OpenAIGPT-5 nano (medium)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
12.50
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricCommand AGPT-5 nano (medium)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)7.012.5+78.6% GPT-5 nano (medium) is 78.6% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)9.01s36.19s+301.7% GPT-5 nano (medium) is 301.7% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$2.50 / $10.0$0.05 / $0.40
Input modalitiesNot reportedNot reported
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerCommand A: what beats itGPT-5 nano (medium): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/command-a/gpt-5-nano-medium · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/command-a/gpt-5-nano-medium?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill