DeepSeek V3 0324 vs Kimi K2.7 Code
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V3 0324 by DeepSeek or Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-09.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K2.7 Code scores 16.6 points higher (26.3 vs 9.7) but costs 11× as much to run the benchmark ($993 vs $87.2; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Kimi K2.7 Code when you need intelligence above 9.7, and DeepSeek V3 0324 when 9.7 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V3 0324 | Kimi K2.7 Code | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 9.7 | 26.3 | +171.1% Kimi K2.7 Code is 2.7× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $87.21 | $992.88 | +1038.5% Kimi K2.7 Code is 11× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 41.22s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.84 / $1.18 | $0.95 / $4.00 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Kimi K2.7 Code vs DeepSeek V3 0324: 171.1% more intelligence, 1038.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V3 0324 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.5 scores 22.30 for $42.6.
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 41.90 for $280.
DeepSeek V3 0324Kimi K2.7 CodeToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3-0324/kimi-k2-7-code · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3-0324/kimi-k2-7-code?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill