DeepSeek V4 Flash (Reasoning, Max Effort) vs HyperNova 60B 2605
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash (Reasoning, Max Effort) by DeepSeek or HyperNova 60B 2605 by Multiverse Computing? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-08-07.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4 Flash (Reasoning, Max Effor… scores 23.8 points higher (42.1 vs 18.3) but costs 2.8× as much to run the benchmark ($104 vs $37.5; mid-range vs budget cost classes). Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash (Reasoning, Max Effor… when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise HyperNova 60B 2605.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash (Reasoning, Max Effort) | HyperNova 60B 2605 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 42.1 | 18.3 | −56.5% HyperNova 60B 2605 is 56.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $104.27 | $37.50 | −64.0% HyperNova 60B 2605 is 64.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 6.93s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.13 / $0.28 | $0.04 / $0.14 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
HyperNova 60B 2605 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash (Reasoning, Max Effort): 56.5% less intelligence, 64.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash (max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Reasoning, Max Effort) scores 51.80 for $72.0.
- HyperNova 60B 2605 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (medium) scores 38.90 for $21.1.
DeepSeek V4 Flash (Reasoning, Max Effort)HyperNova 60B 2605Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-0420/hypernova-60b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-0420/hypernova-60b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill