DeepSeek V4 Flash (Reasoning, Max Effort) vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash (Reasoning, Max Effort) by DeepSeek or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-08-07.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash (Reasoning, Max Effort)
Qwen3 Coder Next vs DeepSeek V4 Flash (Reasoning, Max Effort): 49.4% less intelligence, 139.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash (Reasoning, Max Effort) | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 42.1 | 21.3 | −49.4% Qwen3 Coder Next is 49.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $104.27 | $250.18 | +139.9% Qwen3 Coder Next is 2.4× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 5.28s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.13 / $0.28 | $0.35 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash (max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Reasoning, Max Effort) scores 51.80 for $72.0.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (max) scores 52.30 for $172.
DeepSeek V4 Flash (Reasoning, Max Effort)Qwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-0420/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-0420/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill