DeepSeek V4 Flash (Non-reasoning) vs Gemma 3n E4B Instruct

DeepSeek V4 Flash (Non-reasoning) vs Gemma 3n E4B Instruct. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

DeepSeekDeepSeek V4 Flash (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
28.70
Total cost
-
GoogleGemma 3n E4B InstructNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
1.20
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricDeepSeek V4 Flash (Non-reasoning)Gemma 3n E4B InstructDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)28.71.2−95.8% Gemma 3n E4B Instruct is 95.8% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)5.80s11.67s+101.2% Gemma 3n E4B Instruct is 101.2% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.14 / $0.28$0.02 / $0.04
Input modalitiesNot reportedNot reported
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerDeepSeek V4 Flash (Non-reasoning): what beats itGemma 3n E4B Instruct: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-non-reasoning/gemma-3n-e4b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-non-reasoning/gemma-3n-e4b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill