DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Reasoning, Max Effort) vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Reasoning, Max Effort) by DeepSeek or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-09.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Reasoning, Max Effort)
Qwen3 Coder Next vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Reasoning, Max Effort): 71.1% less intelligence, 6.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 74.6% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Reasoning, Max Effort) | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 35.0 | 10.1 | −71.1% Qwen3 Coder Next is 71.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $445.41 | $476.03 | +6.9% Qwen3 Coder Next is 6.9% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 21.69s | 5.52s | −74.6% Qwen3 Coder Next is 74.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.44 / $1.32 | $0.35 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 41.90 for $280.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 41.90 for $280.
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Reasoning, Max Effort)Qwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vision/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vision/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill