DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) by DeepSeek or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-10.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max)
Qwen3 Coder Next vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max): 73.6% less intelligence, 48.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 37.9% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.8 | 9.2 | −73.6% Qwen3 Coder Next is 73.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $445.41 | $662.85 | +48.8% Qwen3 Coder Next is 48.8% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.42s | 7.71s | −37.9% Qwen3 Coder Next is 37.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.44 / $1.32 | $0.50 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max)Qwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vision/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-vision/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill