DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Reasoning, Max Effort) vs Kimi K2.7 Code
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Reasoning, Max Effort) by DeepSeek or Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-09.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Reasoning, Max Effort)
Kimi K2.7 Code vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Reasoning, Max Effort): 23.8% less intelligence, 109.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 101.3% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Reasoning, Max Effort) | Kimi K2.7 Code | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.5 | 26.3 | −23.8% Kimi K2.7 Code is 23.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $474.19 | $992.88 | +109.4% Kimi K2.7 Code is 2.1× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 20.48s | 41.22s | +101.3% Kimi K2.7 Code is 101.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.44 / $1.32 | $0.95 / $4.00 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 41.90 for $280.
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 41.90 for $280.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Reasoning, Max Effort)Kimi K2.7 CodeToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash/kimi-k2-7-code · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash/kimi-k2-7-code?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill