DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Reasoning, Max Effort) vs Trinity Large Thinking
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Reasoning, Max Effort) by DeepSeek or Trinity Large Thinking by Arcee AI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-09.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Reasoning, Max Effort)
Trinity Large Thinking vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Reasoning, Max Effort): 68.4% less intelligence, 9.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 57.1% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Reasoning, Max Effort) | Trinity Large Thinking | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.5 | 10.9 | −68.4% Trinity Large Thinking is 68.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $474.19 | $518.07 | +9.3% Trinity Large Thinking is 9.3% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 20.48s | 8.78s | −57.1% Trinity Large Thinking is 57.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.44 / $1.32 | $0.25 / $0.90 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 41.90 for $280.
- Trinity Large Thinking is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 41.90 for $280.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (Reasoning, Max Effort)Trinity Large ThinkingToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash/trinity-large-thinking · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-flash/trinity-large-thinking?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill