DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) by DeepSeek or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-30.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) scores 11.2 points higher (20.4 vs 9.2) but costs 1.2× as much to run the benchmark ($566 vs $476; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3 Coder Next.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 20.4 | 9.2 | −54.9% Qwen3 Coder Next is 54.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $566.05 | $476.23 | −15.9% Qwen3 Coder Next is 15.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 4.54s | 5.68s | +25.1% Qwen3 Coder Next is 25.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.32 / $3.96 | $0.35 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Qwen3 Coder Next vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning): 54.9% less intelligence, 15.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 25.1% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (high) scores 50.20 for $521.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning)Qwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-non-reasoning/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-non-reasoning/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill