DeepSeek V4 Pro (Reasoning, Max Effort) vs HyperNova 60B 2605
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Pro (Reasoning, Max Effort) by DeepSeek or HyperNova 60B 2605 by Multiverse Computing? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-08-07.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4 Pro (Reasoning, Max Effort) scores 27.0 points higher (45.3 vs 18.3) but costs 4.7× as much to run the benchmark ($176 vs $37.5; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick DeepSeek V4 Pro (Reasoning, Max Effort) when you need intelligence above 18.3, and HyperNova 60B 2605 when 18.3 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Pro (Reasoning, Max Effort) | HyperNova 60B 2605 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 45.3 | 18.3 | −59.6% HyperNova 60B 2605 is 59.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $176.25 | $37.50 | −78.7% HyperNova 60B 2605 is 78.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 79.57s | 6.93s | −91.3% HyperNova 60B 2605 is 91.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.43 / $0.87 | $0.04 / $0.14 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
HyperNova 60B 2605 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro (Reasoning, Max Effort): 59.6% less intelligence, 78.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 91.3% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Pro (max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (max) scores 52.30 for $172.
- HyperNova 60B 2605 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (medium) scores 38.90 for $21.1.
DeepSeek V4 Pro (Reasoning, Max Effort)HyperNova 60B 2605Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro/hypernova-60b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro/hypernova-60b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill