DeepSeek V4 Pro (Reasoning, Max Effort) vs Kimi K2.7 Code
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Pro (Reasoning, Max Effort) by DeepSeek or Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-08-07.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick DeepSeek V4 Pro (Reasoning, Max Effort)
Kimi K2.7 Code vs DeepSeek V4 Pro (Reasoning, Max Effort): 5.1% less intelligence, 209.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 16.0% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Pro (Reasoning, Max Effort) | Kimi K2.7 Code | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 45.3 | 43.0 | −5.1% Kimi K2.7 Code is 5.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $176.25 | $544.58 | +209.0% Kimi K2.7 Code is 3.1× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 79.57s | 66.82s | −16.0% Kimi K2.7 Code is 16.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.43 / $0.87 | $0.95 / $4.00 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Pro (max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (max) scores 52.30 for $172.
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (max) scores 52.30 for $172.
DeepSeek V4 Pro (Reasoning, Max Effort)Kimi K2.7 CodeToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro/kimi-k2-7-code · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro/kimi-k2-7-code?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill