DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Reasoning, Max Effort) vs Kimi K2.7 Code
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Reasoning, Max Effort) by DeepSeek or Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-09.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Reasoning, Max Ef… scores 10.0 points higher (36.3 vs 26.3) but costs 1.1× as much to run the benchmark ($1122 vs $993; both premium class). Pick DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Reasoning, Max Ef… when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Kimi K2.7 Code.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Reasoning, Max Effort) | Kimi K2.7 Code | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 36.3 | 26.3 | −27.5% Kimi K2.7 Code is 27.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,122.27 | $992.88 | −11.5% Kimi K2.7 Code is 11.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 32.92s | 41.22s | +25.2% Kimi K2.7 Code is 25.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.32 / $3.96 | $0.95 / $4.00 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Kimi K2.7 Code vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Reasoning, Max Effort): 27.5% less intelligence, 11.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 25.2% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 41.90 for $280.
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 41.90 for $280.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Reasoning, Max Effort)Kimi K2.7 CodeToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro/kimi-k2-7-code · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro/kimi-k2-7-code?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill