DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Reasoning, Max Effort) vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Reasoning, Max Effort) by DeepSeek or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-01.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Reasoning, Max Ef… scores 31.9 points higher (53.2 vs 21.3) but costs 2.5× as much to run the benchmark ($617 vs $250; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Reasoning, Max Ef… when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3 Coder Next.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Reasoning, Max Effort) | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 53.2 | 21.3 | −60.0% Qwen3 Coder Next is 60.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $616.95 | $250.18 | −59.4% Qwen3 Coder Next is 59.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 47.89s | 4.49s | −90.6% Qwen3 Coder Next is 90.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.32 / $3.96 | $0.35 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Qwen3 Coder Next vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Reasoning, Max Effort): 60.0% less intelligence, 59.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 90.6% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 57.50 for $138.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 57.50 for $138.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Reasoning, Max Effort)Qwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill