Gemini 3.7 Flash (low) vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.7 Flash (low) by Google or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-08-17.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Gemini 3.7 Flash (low)
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Gemini 3.7 Flash (low): 58.2% less intelligence, 51.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
| Metric | Gemini 3.7 Flash (low) | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 50.9 | 21.3 | −58.2% Qwen3 Coder Next is 58.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $165.16 | $250.18 | +51.5% Qwen3 Coder Next is 51.5% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 4.63s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.75 / $3.75 | $0.35 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.7 Flash (low) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (max) scores 52.30 for $172.
Gemini 3.7 Flash (low)Qwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-7-flash-low/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-7-flash-low/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill