Gemini 3.7 Flash (medium) vs Step 3.7 Flash
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.7 Flash (medium) by Google or Step 3.7 Flash by StepFun? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-08-17.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Gemini 3.7 Flash (medium)
Step 3.7 Flash vs Gemini 3.7 Flash (medium): 42.1% less intelligence, 15.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
| Metric | Gemini 3.7 Flash (medium) | Step 3.7 Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 53.4 | 30.9 | −42.1% Step 3.7 Flash is 42.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $277.50 | $319.97 | +15.3% Step 3.7 Flash is 15.3% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 19.27s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.75 / $3.75 | $0.20 / $1.15 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.7 Flash (medium) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Step 3.7 Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Gemini 3.7 Flash (medium) scores 53.40 for $278.
Gemini 3.7 Flash (medium)Step 3.7 FlashToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-7-flash-medium/step-3-7-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-7-flash-medium/step-3-7-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill