Gemini 3.7 Flash (high) vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.7 Flash (high) by Google or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-08-19.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 3.7 Flash (high) scores 34.7 points higher (56.0 vs 21.3) but costs 1.9× as much to run the benchmark ($485 vs $250; both mid-range class). Pick Gemini 3.7 Flash (high) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3 Coder Next.
| Metric | Gemini 3.7 Flash (high) | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 56.0 | 21.3 | −62.0% Qwen3 Coder Next is 62.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $484.73 | $250.18 | −48.4% Qwen3 Coder Next is 48.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 16.70s | 4.97s | −70.2% Qwen3 Coder Next is 70.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.75 / $3.75 | $0.35 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Gemini 3.7 Flash (high): 62.0% less intelligence, 48.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 70.2% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.7 Flash (high) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (max) scores 52.30 for $172.
Gemini 3.7 Flash (high)Qwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-7-flash/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-7-flash/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill