Gemini 3.7 Flash (high) vs Trinity Large Thinking
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.7 Flash (high) by Google or Trinity Large Thinking by Arcee AI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-01.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 3.7 Flash (high) scores 37.3 points higher (56.0 vs 18.7) but costs 1.7× as much to run the benchmark ($485 vs $289; both mid-range class). Pick Gemini 3.7 Flash (high) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Trinity Large Thinking.
| Metric | Gemini 3.7 Flash (high) | Trinity Large Thinking | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 56.0 | 18.7 | −66.6% Trinity Large Thinking is 66.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $484.73 | $289.19 | −40.3% Trinity Large Thinking is 40.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.04s | 9.47s | −21.3% Trinity Large Thinking is 21.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.75 / $3.75 | $0.25 / $0.90 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Trinity Large Thinking vs Gemini 3.7 Flash (high): 66.6% less intelligence, 40.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 21.3% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.7 Flash (high) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 57.50 for $138.
- Trinity Large Thinking is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 57.50 for $138.
Gemini 3.7 Flash (high)Trinity Large ThinkingToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-7-flash/trinity-large-thinking · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-7-flash/trinity-large-thinking?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill