Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) by Google or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-10.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) scores 31.7 points higher (40.9 vs 9.2) but costs 2.4× as much to run the benchmark ($1623 vs $663; both premium class). Pick Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3 Coder Next.
| Metric | Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 40.9 | 9.2 | −77.5% Qwen3 Coder Next is 77.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,622.73 | $662.85 | −59.2% Qwen3 Coder Next is 59.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 29.15s | 7.71s | −73.6% Qwen3 Coder Next is 73.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.75 / $3.75 | $0.50 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text |
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Gemini 3.8 Flash (High): 77.5% less intelligence, 59.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 73.6% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
Gemini 3.8 Flash (High)Qwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-8-flash/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-8-flash/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill