Gemini 3.8 Flash (high) vs Trinity Large Thinking
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.8 Flash (high) by Google or Trinity Large Thinking by Arcee AI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-22.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 3.8 Flash (high) scores 30.1 points higher (40.9 vs 10.8) but costs 3.1× as much to run the benchmark ($1623 vs $518; both premium class). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 3.8 Flash (high) when you need intelligence above 10.8, and Trinity Large Thinking when 10.8 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 3.8 Flash (high) | Trinity Large Thinking | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 40.9 | 10.8 | −73.6% Trinity Large Thinking is 73.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,622.73 | $518.07 | −68.1% Trinity Large Thinking is 68.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 16.92s | 9.39s | −44.5% Trinity Large Thinking is 44.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.75 / $3.75 | $0.25 / $0.90 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text |
Trinity Large Thinking vs Gemini 3.8 Flash (high): 73.6% less intelligence, 68.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 44.5% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.8 Flash (high) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Trinity Large Thinking is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Gemini 3.8 Flash (high)Trinity Large ThinkingToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-8-flash/trinity-large-thinking · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-8-flash/trinity-large-thinking?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill