Gemma 3n E4B Instruct vs Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct

Gemma 3n E4B Instruct vs Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

GoogleGemma 3n E4B InstructNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
1.00
Total cost
-
MicrosoftPhi-4 Multimodal InstructNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
4.20
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGemma 3n E4B InstructPhi-4 Multimodal InstructDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)1.04.2+320.0% Phi-4 Multimodal Inst… is 4.2× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)10.53s29.50s+180.2% Phi-4 Multimodal Inst… is 180.2% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.06 / $0.12$0.00 / $0.00
Input modalitiesNot reportedNot reported
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGemma 3n E4B Instruct: what beats itPhi-4 Multimodal Instruct: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-3n-e4b/phi-4-multimodal · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-3n-e4b/phi-4-multimodal?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill