Gemma 3n E4B Instruct vs Qwen3 Coder Next

Gemma 3n E4B Instruct vs Qwen3 Coder Next. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

GoogleGemma 3n E4B InstructNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
1.00
Total cost
-
AlibabaQwen3 Coder NextOff the frontier
Intelligence
21.30
Total cost
$250
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGemma 3n E4B InstructQwen3 Coder NextDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)1.021.3+2030.0% Qwen3 Coder Next is 21× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$250.18— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)10.53s4.97s−52.8% Qwen3 Coder Next is 52.8% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.06 / $0.12$0.35 / $1.20
Input modalitiesNot reportedNot reported
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGemma 3n E4B Instruct: what beats itQwen3 Coder Next: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-3n-e4b/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-3n-e4b/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill