Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning) vs Kimi K2.7 Code
Which is better for the money: Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning) by Google or Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-08-17.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K2.7 Code scores 16.9 points higher (43.0 vs 26.1) but costs 9.1× as much to run the benchmark ($545 vs $59.5; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Kimi K2.7 Code when you need intelligence above 26.1, and Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning) when 26.1 is enough.
| Metric | Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning) | Kimi K2.7 Code | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.1 | 43.0 | +64.8% Kimi K2.7 Code is 64.8% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $59.52 | $544.58 | +815.0% Kimi K2.7 Code is 9.1× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 73.20s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.13 / $0.40 | $0.95 / $4.00 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Kimi K2.7 Code vs Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning): 64.8% more intelligence, 815.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (high) scores 47.00 for $55.0.
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Gemini 3.7 Flash (high) scores 56.00 for $485.
Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning)Kimi K2.7 CodeToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b/kimi-k2-7-code · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b/kimi-k2-7-code?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill