Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning) by Google or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-07-17.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning)
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning): 17.9% less intelligence, 376.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
| Metric | Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning) | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 25.7 | 21.1 | −17.9% Qwen3 Coder Next is 17.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $51.92 | $247.26 | +376.2% Qwen3 Coder Next is 4.8× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 6.61s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.13 / $0.40 | $0.35 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.5 scores 37.20 for $25.2.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Terra (medium) scores 45.60 for $240.
Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning)Qwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-26b-a4b/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill