Gemma 4 31B (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: Gemma 4 31B (Non-reasoning) by Google or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-08-07.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Gemma 4 31B (Non-reasoning)
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Gemma 4 31B (Non-reasoning): 4.5% less intelligence, 662.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 48.7% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | Gemma 4 31B (Non-reasoning) | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 22.3 | 21.3 | −4.5% Qwen3 Coder Next is 4.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $32.80 | $250.18 | +662.7% Qwen3 Coder Next is 7.6× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 10.29s | 5.28s | −48.7% Qwen3 Coder Next is 48.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.15 / $0.40 | $0.35 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemma 4 31B (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (medium) scores 38.90 for $21.1.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (max) scores 52.30 for $172.
Gemma 4 31B (Non-reasoning)Qwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-31b-non-reasoning/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-31b-non-reasoning/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill