Gemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-6 Astra (medium)
Gemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-6 Astra (medium). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Gemma 4 E4B (Non-reasoning) | GPT-6 Astra (medium) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 7.5 | 49.7 | +562.7% GPT-6 Astra (medium) is 6.6× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | Not reported | $2,434.12 | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 13.33s | 15.81s | +18.6% GPT-6 Astra (medium) is 18.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.02 / $0.10 | $10.0 / $50.0 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b-non-reasoning/gpt-6-astra-medium · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b-non-reasoning/gpt-6-astra-medium?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill