Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) vs Inkling (xhigh)

Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) vs Inkling (xhigh). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

GoogleGemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
12.20
Total cost
-
Thinking MachinesInkling (xhigh)Off the frontier
Intelligence
42.30
Total cost
$698
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)Inkling (xhigh)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)12.242.3+246.7% Inkling (xhigh) is 3.5× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$698.28— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)46.84s35.55s−24.1% Inkling (xhigh) is 24.1% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.02 / $0.10$1.00 / $4.05
Input modalitiesNot reportedNot reported
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGemma 4 E4B (Reasoning): what beats itInkling (xhigh): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b/inkling · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b/inkling?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill