Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) vs Nova 2.0 Lite (medium)

Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) vs Nova 2.0 Lite (medium). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

GoogleGemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
8.90
Total cost
-
AmazonNova 2.0 Lite (medium)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
12.50
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)Nova 2.0 Lite (medium)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)8.912.5+40.4% Nova 2.0 Lite (medium) is 40.4% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)61.26s28.40s−53.6% Nova 2.0 Lite (medium) is 53.6% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.02 / $0.10$0.30 / $2.50
Input modalitiesNot reportedNot reported
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGemma 4 E4B (Reasoning): what beats itNova 2.0 Lite (medium): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b/nova-2-0-lite-reasoning-medium · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b/nova-2-0-lite-reasoning-medium?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill