GLM-4.6 (Reasoning) vs Kimi K2.7 Code
Which is better for the money: GLM-4.6 (Reasoning) by Z AI or Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-08-19.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K2.7 Code scores 13.7 points higher (43.0 vs 29.3) but costs 1.7× as much to run the benchmark ($545 vs $314; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick Kimi K2.7 Code when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise GLM-4.6 (Reasoning).
| Metric | GLM-4.6 (Reasoning) | Kimi K2.7 Code | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 29.3 | 43.0 | +46.8% Kimi K2.7 Code is 46.8% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $314.30 | $544.58 | +73.3% Kimi K2.7 Code is 73.3% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 52.69s | 75.91s | +44.1% Kimi K2.7 Code is 44.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.55 / $2.20 | $0.95 / $4.00 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Kimi K2.7 Code vs GLM-4.6 (Reasoning): 46.8% more intelligence, 73.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 44.1% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GLM-4.6 (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Gemini 3.7 Flash (medium) scores 53.40 for $278.
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Gemini 3.7 Flash (high) scores 56.00 for $485.
GLM-4.6 (Reasoning)Kimi K2.7 CodeToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6-reasoning/kimi-k2-7-code · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-6-reasoning/kimi-k2-7-code?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill