GLM-4.7 (Non-reasoning) vs Step 3.5 Flash

GLM-4.7 (Non-reasoning) vs Step 3.5 Flash. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-4.7 (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
26.60
Total cost
-
StepFunStep 3.5 FlashNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
25.50
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-4.7 (Non-reasoning)Step 3.5 FlashDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)26.625.5−4.1% Step 3.5 Flash is 4.1% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)5.99s10.32s+72.3% Step 3.5 Flash is 72.3% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.60 / $2.20$0.10 / $0.30
Input modalitiesNot reportedNot reported
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-4.7 (Non-reasoning): what beats itStep 3.5 Flash: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-7-non-reasoning/step-3-5-flash-0202 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-7-non-reasoning/step-3-5-flash-0202?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill