GLM-4.7 (Reasoning) vs Kimi K2.7 Code
Which is better for the money: GLM-4.7 (Reasoning) by Z AI or Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-08-07.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Kimi K2.7 Code
Kimi K2.7 Code vs GLM-4.7 (Reasoning): 24.6% more intelligence, 10.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 147.3% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | GLM-4.7 (Reasoning) | Kimi K2.7 Code | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.5 | 43.0 | +24.6% Kimi K2.7 Code is 24.6% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $607.19 | $544.58 | −10.3% Kimi K2.7 Code is 10.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 27.02s | 66.82s | +147.3% Kimi K2.7 Code is 147.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.60 / $2.20 | $0.95 / $4.00 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GLM-4.7 (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Grok 4.5 (high) scores 55.80 for $579.
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (max) scores 52.30 for $172.
GLM-4.7 (Reasoning)Kimi K2.7 CodeToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-7/kimi-k2-7-code · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-4-7/kimi-k2-7-code?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill