GLM-5.2 (max) vs Kimi K2.7 Code
Which is better for the money: GLM-5.2 (max) by Z AI or Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-08-19.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GLM-5.2 (max) scores 9.6 points higher (52.6 vs 43.0) but costs 1.5× as much to run the benchmark ($843 vs $545; both premium class). Pick GLM-5.2 (max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Kimi K2.7 Code.
| Metric | GLM-5.2 (max) | Kimi K2.7 Code | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 52.6 | 43.0 | −18.3% Kimi K2.7 Code is 18.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $843.44 | $544.58 | −35.4% Kimi K2.7 Code is 35.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 23.83s | 75.91s | +218.5% Kimi K2.7 Code is 218.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.40 / $4.40 | $0.95 / $4.00 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Kimi K2.7 Code vs GLM-5.2 (max): 18.3% less intelligence, 35.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 218.5% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GLM-5.2 (max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Muse Spark 1.2 (xhigh) scores 56.80 for $639.
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Gemini 3.7 Flash (high) scores 56.00 for $485.
GLM-5.2 (max)Kimi K2.7 CodeToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-2/kimi-k2-7-code · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-2/kimi-k2-7-code?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill