GLM-5.2 (max) vs Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct

GLM-5.2 (max) vs Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Z AIGLM-5.2 (max)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
38.60
Total cost
-
MicrosoftPhi-4 Multimodal InstructNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
5.80
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricGLM-5.2 (max)Phi-4 Multimodal InstructDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)38.65.8−85.0% Phi-4 Multimodal Inst… is 85.0% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)41.06s29.86s−27.3% Phi-4 Multimodal Inst… is 27.3% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$1.40 / $4.40$0.00 / $0.00
Input modalitiesNot reportedNot reported
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerGLM-5.2 (max): what beats itPhi-4 Multimodal Instruct: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-2/phi-4-multimodal · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-2/phi-4-multimodal?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill