GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: GLM-5.3-Flash by Z AI or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-09.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GLM-5.3-Flash
Qwen3 Coder Next vs GLM-5.3-Flash: 75.9% less intelligence, 69.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 86.0% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | GLM-5.3-Flash | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 41.9 | 10.1 | −75.9% Qwen3 Coder Next is 75.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $280.28 | $476.03 | +69.8% Qwen3 Coder Next is 69.8% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 39.52s | 5.52s | −86.0% Qwen3 Coder Next is 86.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.15 / $0.50 | $0.35 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GLM-5.3-Flash is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 41.90 for $280.
GLM-5.3-FlashQwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-3-flash/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-3-flash/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill