GLM 5.3 Flash vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: GLM 5.3 Flash by Z AI or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-22.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GLM 5.3 Flash
Qwen3 Coder Next vs GLM 5.3 Flash: 78.0% less intelligence, 69.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 77.3% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | GLM 5.3 Flash | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 41.8 | 9.2 | −78.0% Qwen3 Coder Next is 78.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $280.28 | $476.23 | +69.9% Qwen3 Coder Next is 69.9% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 30.64s | 6.95s | −77.3% Qwen3 Coder Next is 77.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.15 / $0.50 | $0.35 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GLM 5.3 Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
GLM 5.3 FlashQwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-3-flash/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-3-flash/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill